The following post was born out of a conversation i had today with Ameya, in reply to his two newest posts, which can be found here and there. It started off as a discussion of the current education system in India and what we can do to change it, instead of just cribbing about how sucky it is. [For the original IM version of this post (edited, of course), go to MY OTHER BLOG ]
A prelude - One may say that the only guys who have performed exceedingly well after studying science in 11th and 12th are the ones who’ve gotten through the IIT-JEE and other competitive exams. The interesting thing is, more than 80% of the guys who pass JEE are still not satisfied ! Because they will mostly not get the course they want, as there are only 1000-2000 seats in sought-after courses in IITs. Then, there are people like me with a poor rank who wont get any course at all, even though we’ve cleared the JEE.
Let’s take a scenario, to better understand the argument – Say we have a guy who is really interested in comp science but ends up getting a 2000+ rank in JEE and has to settle for a so-called “lower branch” like chem in IITM. He will not be happy ! Of course, he will be happy for the next few years, coz he’s in an IIT but what then, once he passes out ? He would have spent countless hours studying chem engg, something he doesnt even enjoy/excel at and in a few years time, perhaps an “ordinary” comp engineer from ramaiah/rv will overtake him.
Therefore, a majority of people who got thru JEE are also not happy. 99.9 percent of people who have written the JEE are disappointed.
THAT, is unfair.
A semblance of a solution – What i think may work is a system a la Harry Potter(a selection of career options based on your grades after the O.W.Ls) , or more realistically, a system similar to the one implemented in western society today.
How about something radical, like when a student is in 9th and 10th grade, he has to take up a wide variety of courses and mark out the courses he is interested in. Then in 11th and 12, he gets to narrow down the field even more. This is somewhat similar to the current system itself - the idea is the courses we do in first year of engineering, like a bit of mech/math/comps/physics/chem/electronics can be done much earlier. ( I know engineering is not everything, but this is just an example !). So we get a taste of everything, beforehand.
You may say that this is too much for a “child” to learn but 1- its just a teaser-trailer of the actual subject, just enough to arouse interest and 2- a lot of our learning today is repetitive – we learn the same thing in college and again in coaching classes- why don’t we learn it correctly once and for all !
So first we must identify the major fields one can contribute to. It is an oft-repeated statement that in our country every youngster is only offered with 2 “real” options - engineering or medicine. What we have to do now, is offer a student more choices, at an earlier stage and gradually narrow it down. Its all about consumerism, where the customer is king. Right now, society tells us what to do, but ideally, society shud ask us what we want to do.
Lets say that in 9th/10th we have – history, geography, civics, math, life-science, physics, chemistry, technology, current affairs and language – these are our subjects spread out over 2 semesters/years.
Now, the grading for these subjects must be continuous and must include things like attentive-ness of the student during these classes and enthusiasm of the student while doing projects in a particular subject. For instance ,if a student scores 70% in the exam for comp science but is 100% interested in it, as a teacher i would rather teach him than some guy who hates comp science but mugs all night to score a 100%.
I’m sure this idea has its flaws, but education HAS TO be student centric . Its sounds very, very idealistic, but some percentage of evaluation has to be set aside for the students passion/interest.
An instance of the solution – Now lets assume i’m a student of this Utopian system. (I’m yet to figure out the 1st to 7th/8th grade details, but) right now, im entering 9th grade and i want you to understand my mentality and knowledge level. So far my education is such that i know as much as, lets say in our system today, an ICSE kid knows in 8th grade. So i have more than a rudimentary understanding of social science, science, math, technology, current affairs. enough to get me through the rest of life alright.
[Like enough math to not get cheated in shops, even enough math to calculate basic optimisation and stuff, enough history/geography to understand what's written in newspapers and stuff]
Now in 9th grade, I do 10 courses in 2 semesters. At the end of 9th.. i show most interest and perform best at .. lets say 6-8 courses -
history
nature/life sciences
geography
technology
current affairs
physics
and language
In 10th grade i’ll be studying a higher level of these courses, so when i write my 10th grade exams i can eliminate 2-3 more options.
[There can be arguments like you cant do higher physics without higher math, etc. etc., but each of these courses is completely exclusive of the other, i.e. higher physics will teach you enough math as part of its syllabus to handle the physics you're learning]
Let’s say im left with History, Technology, Current affairs, and Language for my 11th/12th. Now wat happens is : There is an exams committee for every one of the original 10 subjects i listed. Each exam committee consists of experts from that field so at the end of my 12th , I will take 4 exams and based on my ranking in each of those exams, my interest and other factors i can take up a degree course in any of these subjects.
Now that will result in fewer students writing every exam, better looking report cards, and fatter pay-checks when you eventually pass out as a specialist ! All-in-all, an utterly enjoyable student life …

